In El Pais published an article today which a brief review of ten projects of films that did not go ahead because of the producers. They are all ambitious projects, super risky assumption that its promoters had an enormous success or a total ruin.
But what would have been wonderful to see Kubrick's Napoleon, played by Jack Nicholson, in the battle of Waterloo, surrounded by thousands of extras, something like Barry Lyndon's wonderful but way. Or that Batman in the forties directed by Orson Welles, starring Gregory Peck and the diva Marlene Dietrich as Catwoman, only seven years after the character appeared in his first comic. Not to mention the great (I have no doubt) Genesis Bresson film or subjective (from the point of view of the protagonist) of Hitchcock.
Anyway, we've run out of big jewelry. And which, lest we forget, the film is an expensive art and producers have to seek their profitability above all, what can we do.
But what would have been wonderful to see Kubrick's Napoleon, played by Jack Nicholson, in the battle of Waterloo, surrounded by thousands of extras, something like Barry Lyndon's wonderful but way. Or that Batman in the forties directed by Orson Welles, starring Gregory Peck and the diva Marlene Dietrich as Catwoman, only seven years after the character appeared in his first comic. Not to mention the great (I have no doubt) Genesis Bresson film or subjective (from the point of view of the protagonist) of Hitchcock.
Anyway, we've run out of big jewelry. And which, lest we forget, the film is an expensive art and producers have to seek their profitability above all, what can we do.
0 comments:
Post a Comment